Recently, a very interesting (and "delicious") dispute has unfolded in the world of trademarks surrounding the Colombian fried chicken brand FRISBY.

The question of whether a realistic photograph of a human face can be registered as a trademark has long sparked heated debate among lawyers. Recently, this discussion reached the highest level: the Budapest Metropolitan Court turned to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling in a case involving a Hungarian law firm.

Recently, a high-profile scandal occurred in the world of artificial intelligence: Anthropic, the creator of the well-known AI Claude, accidentally made part of the internal source code for its tool Claude Code publicly available due to an unfortunate "human error."

The U.S. Court of Appeals considered a case regarding whether using information already disclosed in an inventor's public patents constitutes theft of trade secrets. The court ruled that patent protection precludes maintaining secrecy over the same technology.

A legal battle is unfolding within the walls of the US Supreme Court that in the coming years could change the cost of medications in pharmacies and the rules of competition in many industries. The subject of the dispute is the fine line between the legal sale of cheap generic analogues and the hidden theft of others' intellectual achievements.

Samsung is facing major trouble: the American firm Lepton Computing LLC has filed a lawsuit against them. The core of the claim is simple: "We invented foldable phones 10 years ago, and Samsung stole our ideas."