+38 067 242 88 94
UA
+38 044 599 5505
UA
+35 987 727 87 44
BG
office@intectica.com
Home
Services
Regulatory
Educational center
Pricing
Our History
Blog
Contacts
+38 067 242 88 94
UA
+38 044 599 5505
UA
+35 987 727 87 44
BG
office@intectica.com
EN
UA
27 April 2026
The Battle for the “Irish Beef” Brand: Why did the EU Court side with the State instead of the farmers?
In Europe, there is a special protection for unique products (the so-called PGI status or "Geographical Indication"). It acts as a "seal of quality" ensuring that, for instance, "Irish Beef" is truly meat from cows raised on the green fields of Ireland, rather than just a marketing name.
24 April 2026
How to Protect a “Position Mark”: Lessons from the Adidas v. Thom Browne Battle
A recent UK case between the sporting giant Adidas and the fashion house Thom Browne has become a definitive guide on how courts evaluate unconventional trademarks. While Adidas sought to protect its three stripes and Thom Browne defended its four, the court’s findings are vital for any business.
23 April 2026
The Battle for the “Garden”: Boston Stadium Owners Sue Cannabis Dispensary Over Name
The owners of the famous TD Garden sports arena in Boston have filed a lawsuit against a local medical marijuana dispensary operating under the name “The Boston Garden.” The sports moguls claim that the shop’s branding is too similar to the name of the legendary old stadium — “The Boston Garden” — which closed its doors back in 1995.
22 April 2026
How Apple’s “Double-Click to Pay” Feature Passed the Inventive Step Test
Many of us use the Apple feature where a double-click of a button allows for payment via Apple Pay without even unlocking the iPhone. Interestingly, this very technology became the focus of a recent landmark decision by the Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO).
21 April 2026
Minimal Use — Maximum Protection: A Troubling Trend in Kazakhstan
Court rulings in Kazakhstan demonstrate an inconsistent and, at times, unpredictable approach to trademark disputes. It appears that even highly limited use of a brand name can suffice to maintain broad legal protection.
20 April 2026
“My Hermès is at Home”: Humor Does Not Absolve Liability for Trademark Infringement in France
In a decision dated March 25, 2026, the Versailles Court of Appeal brought a high-profile case initiated by the fashion house Hermès to a close. The core of the conflict involved a company selling handbags that were nearly exact replicas of the legendary Birkin and Kelly models. The only distinction was the humorous slogans emblazoned on the front.
<<
3
4
5
6
7
...
24
Please, choose services
Trademark
Patent
Design